Review



hiblock buffer  (Revvity)


Bioz Verified Symbol Revvity is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Revvity manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 91

    Structured Review

    Revvity hiblock buffer
    Hiblock Buffer, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 6 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hiblock buffer/product/Revvity
    Average 91 stars, based on 6 article reviews
    hiblock buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    91/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    91
    Revvity hiblock buffer
    Hiblock Buffer, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hiblock buffer/product/Revvity
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hiblock buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    Revvity alphalisa hiblock buffer
    ASO-001933 is a highly potent and selective ASO targeting MAPT on human neurons (A) Schematic diagram of ASO treatment schedule in hESCs for (B)–(F). (B) Dose-dependent reduction of MAPT expression at RNA and protein level upon ASO-001933 or BIIB080 treatment. hESC-derived neurons were treated with ASO at indicated concentrations. RNA and protein levels were assessed by qRT-PCR and <t>AlphaLISA</t> respectively. Absolute IC 50 values are reported in the figure (n = 3 /treatment, mean +/- SEM). (C) Quantification of 3R and 4R Tau mRNA by qPCR after ASO treatment at 1 μM (n = 3 /treatment, mean +/- SEM). (D and E) Representative images of RNAscope ISH and ICC using probes against MAPT CDS, MAPT 3′ UTR (D) and antibody against Tau (Tau HT7) (E). (F) Volcano plot illustrating differentially regulated proteins from proteomics analysis between ASO-001933-treated cells versus NT ASO-treated neurons (n = 3). MAPT is the only significantly regulated protein (Log2 FC = −2.94, adjusted Log10 p value = −4.54). (G) Evaluation of off-target effects of ASO-001933 in hiPSC-derived neurons. Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes (Log2FC > 1 or Log2FC< −1 and −Log10 adjusted p >20) from RNA-seq analysis after 72 h of treatment (n = 3).
    Alphalisa Hiblock Buffer, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/alphalisa hiblock buffer/product/Revvity
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    alphalisa hiblock buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    Revvity alphalisa buffer
    a Illustration of the specific <t>AlphaLISA</t> protein–protein interaction assay designed for A 2A R–D 2 R heteromer identification and quantification in native tissue; anti-guinea pig-coated acceptor beads (red sphere) were generated to capture a guinea pig anti-A 2A R antibodies bound to the receptors within the membrane extract; anti-rabbit coated donor beads (blue sphere) capture the immune complexes between the rabbit anti-D 2 R antibodies and the receptors within the membrane extract; A 2A R–D 2 R heteromerization brings donor beads into close proximity (<200 nm) to the acceptor beads. The excitation of the donor beads at 680 nm generates singlet oxygen ( 1 O 2 ) molecules triggering a chemical reaction within the acceptor beads, which results in a sharp peak of fluorescent emission at 615 nm (figure designed using image templates from Servier Medical Art https://smart.servier.com/image-set-download/ ). b The A 2A R–D 2 R interaction capacity in membranes from saline- ( n = 10) and PCP- ( n = 10) treated mouse striatum (left panel) or from postmortem control ( n = 10) and schizophrenic ( n = 10; SCZ) caudate (right panel) was determined by AlphaLISA method (see ‘Methods’); the specific AlphaLISA signal (i.e., ∆AlphaLISA) was calculated as described in the ‘Methods’ section and expressed as percentage (mean ± SEM) of either the saline-treated mice or control subjects. ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001, Student’s t -test.
    Alphalisa Buffer, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/alphalisa buffer/product/Revvity
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    alphalisa buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    Revvity hiblock alphalisa buffer
    a Illustration of the specific <t>AlphaLISA</t> protein–protein interaction assay designed for A 2A R–D 2 R heteromer identification and quantification in native tissue; anti-guinea pig-coated acceptor beads (red sphere) were generated to capture a guinea pig anti-A 2A R antibodies bound to the receptors within the membrane extract; anti-rabbit coated donor beads (blue sphere) capture the immune complexes between the rabbit anti-D 2 R antibodies and the receptors within the membrane extract; A 2A R–D 2 R heteromerization brings donor beads into close proximity (<200 nm) to the acceptor beads. The excitation of the donor beads at 680 nm generates singlet oxygen ( 1 O 2 ) molecules triggering a chemical reaction within the acceptor beads, which results in a sharp peak of fluorescent emission at 615 nm (figure designed using image templates from Servier Medical Art https://smart.servier.com/image-set-download/ ). b The A 2A R–D 2 R interaction capacity in membranes from saline- ( n = 10) and PCP- ( n = 10) treated mouse striatum (left panel) or from postmortem control ( n = 10) and schizophrenic ( n = 10; SCZ) caudate (right panel) was determined by AlphaLISA method (see ‘Methods’); the specific AlphaLISA signal (i.e., ∆AlphaLISA) was calculated as described in the ‘Methods’ section and expressed as percentage (mean ± SEM) of either the saline-treated mice or control subjects. ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001, Student’s t -test.
    Hiblock Alphalisa Buffer, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hiblock alphalisa buffer/product/Revvity
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hiblock alphalisa buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    Revvity hiblock
    a Illustration of the specific <t>AlphaLISA</t> protein–protein interaction assay designed for A 2A R–D 2 R heteromer identification and quantification in native tissue; anti-guinea pig-coated acceptor beads (red sphere) were generated to capture a guinea pig anti-A 2A R antibodies bound to the receptors within the membrane extract; anti-rabbit coated donor beads (blue sphere) capture the immune complexes between the rabbit anti-D 2 R antibodies and the receptors within the membrane extract; A 2A R–D 2 R heteromerization brings donor beads into close proximity (<200 nm) to the acceptor beads. The excitation of the donor beads at 680 nm generates singlet oxygen ( 1 O 2 ) molecules triggering a chemical reaction within the acceptor beads, which results in a sharp peak of fluorescent emission at 615 nm (figure designed using image templates from Servier Medical Art https://smart.servier.com/image-set-download/ ). b The A 2A R–D 2 R interaction capacity in membranes from saline- ( n = 10) and PCP- ( n = 10) treated mouse striatum (left panel) or from postmortem control ( n = 10) and schizophrenic ( n = 10; SCZ) caudate (right panel) was determined by AlphaLISA method (see ‘Methods’); the specific AlphaLISA signal (i.e., ∆AlphaLISA) was calculated as described in the ‘Methods’ section and expressed as percentage (mean ± SEM) of either the saline-treated mice or control subjects. ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001, Student’s t -test.
    Hiblock, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hiblock/product/Revvity
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hiblock - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    Revvity alphalisa hiblock buffer solution
    a Illustration of the specific <t>AlphaLISA</t> protein–protein interaction assay designed for A 2A R–D 2 R heteromer identification and quantification in native tissue; anti-guinea pig-coated acceptor beads (red sphere) were generated to capture a guinea pig anti-A 2A R antibodies bound to the receptors within the membrane extract; anti-rabbit coated donor beads (blue sphere) capture the immune complexes between the rabbit anti-D 2 R antibodies and the receptors within the membrane extract; A 2A R–D 2 R heteromerization brings donor beads into close proximity (<200 nm) to the acceptor beads. The excitation of the donor beads at 680 nm generates singlet oxygen ( 1 O 2 ) molecules triggering a chemical reaction within the acceptor beads, which results in a sharp peak of fluorescent emission at 615 nm (figure designed using image templates from Servier Medical Art https://smart.servier.com/image-set-download/ ). b The A 2A R–D 2 R interaction capacity in membranes from saline- ( n = 10) and PCP- ( n = 10) treated mouse striatum (left panel) or from postmortem control ( n = 10) and schizophrenic ( n = 10; SCZ) caudate (right panel) was determined by AlphaLISA method (see ‘Methods’); the specific AlphaLISA signal (i.e., ∆AlphaLISA) was calculated as described in the ‘Methods’ section and expressed as percentage (mean ± SEM) of either the saline-treated mice or control subjects. ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001, Student’s t -test.
    Alphalisa Hiblock Buffer Solution, supplied by Revvity, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/alphalisa hiblock buffer solution/product/Revvity
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    alphalisa hiblock buffer solution - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ASO-001933 is a highly potent and selective ASO targeting MAPT on human neurons (A) Schematic diagram of ASO treatment schedule in hESCs for (B)–(F). (B) Dose-dependent reduction of MAPT expression at RNA and protein level upon ASO-001933 or BIIB080 treatment. hESC-derived neurons were treated with ASO at indicated concentrations. RNA and protein levels were assessed by qRT-PCR and AlphaLISA respectively. Absolute IC 50 values are reported in the figure (n = 3 /treatment, mean +/- SEM). (C) Quantification of 3R and 4R Tau mRNA by qPCR after ASO treatment at 1 μM (n = 3 /treatment, mean +/- SEM). (D and E) Representative images of RNAscope ISH and ICC using probes against MAPT CDS, MAPT 3′ UTR (D) and antibody against Tau (Tau HT7) (E). (F) Volcano plot illustrating differentially regulated proteins from proteomics analysis between ASO-001933-treated cells versus NT ASO-treated neurons (n = 3). MAPT is the only significantly regulated protein (Log2 FC = −2.94, adjusted Log10 p value = −4.54). (G) Evaluation of off-target effects of ASO-001933 in hiPSC-derived neurons. Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes (Log2FC > 1 or Log2FC< −1 and −Log10 adjusted p >20) from RNA-seq analysis after 72 h of treatment (n = 3).

    Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids

    Article Title: Identification and characterization of a MAPT-targeting locked nucleic acid antisense oligonucleotide therapeutic for tauopathies

    doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2022.07.027

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ASO-001933 is a highly potent and selective ASO targeting MAPT on human neurons (A) Schematic diagram of ASO treatment schedule in hESCs for (B)–(F). (B) Dose-dependent reduction of MAPT expression at RNA and protein level upon ASO-001933 or BIIB080 treatment. hESC-derived neurons were treated with ASO at indicated concentrations. RNA and protein levels were assessed by qRT-PCR and AlphaLISA respectively. Absolute IC 50 values are reported in the figure (n = 3 /treatment, mean +/- SEM). (C) Quantification of 3R and 4R Tau mRNA by qPCR after ASO treatment at 1 μM (n = 3 /treatment, mean +/- SEM). (D and E) Representative images of RNAscope ISH and ICC using probes against MAPT CDS, MAPT 3′ UTR (D) and antibody against Tau (Tau HT7) (E). (F) Volcano plot illustrating differentially regulated proteins from proteomics analysis between ASO-001933-treated cells versus NT ASO-treated neurons (n = 3). MAPT is the only significantly regulated protein (Log2 FC = −2.94, adjusted Log10 p value = −4.54). (G) Evaluation of off-target effects of ASO-001933 in hiPSC-derived neurons. Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes (Log2FC > 1 or Log2FC< −1 and −Log10 adjusted p >20) from RNA-seq analysis after 72 h of treatment (n = 3).

    Article Snippet: Cell extracts were diluted 20-fold into AlphaLISA HiBlock buffer (PerkinElmer) for assay.

    Techniques: Expressing, Derivative Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, RNAscope, RNA Sequencing

    a Illustration of the specific AlphaLISA protein–protein interaction assay designed for A 2A R–D 2 R heteromer identification and quantification in native tissue; anti-guinea pig-coated acceptor beads (red sphere) were generated to capture a guinea pig anti-A 2A R antibodies bound to the receptors within the membrane extract; anti-rabbit coated donor beads (blue sphere) capture the immune complexes between the rabbit anti-D 2 R antibodies and the receptors within the membrane extract; A 2A R–D 2 R heteromerization brings donor beads into close proximity (<200 nm) to the acceptor beads. The excitation of the donor beads at 680 nm generates singlet oxygen ( 1 O 2 ) molecules triggering a chemical reaction within the acceptor beads, which results in a sharp peak of fluorescent emission at 615 nm (figure designed using image templates from Servier Medical Art https://smart.servier.com/image-set-download/ ). b The A 2A R–D 2 R interaction capacity in membranes from saline- ( n = 10) and PCP- ( n = 10) treated mouse striatum (left panel) or from postmortem control ( n = 10) and schizophrenic ( n = 10; SCZ) caudate (right panel) was determined by AlphaLISA method (see ‘Methods’); the specific AlphaLISA signal (i.e., ∆AlphaLISA) was calculated as described in the ‘Methods’ section and expressed as percentage (mean ± SEM) of either the saline-treated mice or control subjects. ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001, Student’s t -test.

    Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology

    Article Title: Decreased striatal adenosine A 2A -dopamine D 2 receptor heteromerization in schizophrenia

    doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00872-9

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Illustration of the specific AlphaLISA protein–protein interaction assay designed for A 2A R–D 2 R heteromer identification and quantification in native tissue; anti-guinea pig-coated acceptor beads (red sphere) were generated to capture a guinea pig anti-A 2A R antibodies bound to the receptors within the membrane extract; anti-rabbit coated donor beads (blue sphere) capture the immune complexes between the rabbit anti-D 2 R antibodies and the receptors within the membrane extract; A 2A R–D 2 R heteromerization brings donor beads into close proximity (<200 nm) to the acceptor beads. The excitation of the donor beads at 680 nm generates singlet oxygen ( 1 O 2 ) molecules triggering a chemical reaction within the acceptor beads, which results in a sharp peak of fluorescent emission at 615 nm (figure designed using image templates from Servier Medical Art https://smart.servier.com/image-set-download/ ). b The A 2A R–D 2 R interaction capacity in membranes from saline- ( n = 10) and PCP- ( n = 10) treated mouse striatum (left panel) or from postmortem control ( n = 10) and schizophrenic ( n = 10; SCZ) caudate (right panel) was determined by AlphaLISA method (see ‘Methods’); the specific AlphaLISA signal (i.e., ∆AlphaLISA) was calculated as described in the ‘Methods’ section and expressed as percentage (mean ± SEM) of either the saline-treated mice or control subjects. ** P < 0.01 and *** P < 0.001, Student’s t -test.

    Article Snippet: Mouse striatal and human caudate membranes were homogenized in AlphaLISA buffer (AlphaLISA HiBlock Buffer, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, EEUU) and protein concentration determined.

    Techniques: Protein Protein Interaction Assay, Generated, Membrane, Saline, Control

    a PPI impairment in saline- ( n = 10) and PCP-treated animals ( n = 10) with or without chronic treatment with haloperidol (Halo, 0.1 mg/kg/day for 5 days) or clozapine (Clz, 10 mg/kg/day for 5 days); results are expressed as percentage (mean ± SEM) of inhibition of ASR at the 75 dB amplitude prepulse acoustic stimulus; * P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test compared to saline-treated mice. b A 2A R–D 2 R heteromerization in striatal membranes from the same animals shown in a determined by AlphaLISA method (see ‘Methods’); the specific AlphaLISA signal (i.e., ∆AlphaLISA) was calculated as described in the ‘Methods’ section and expressed as percentage (mean ± SEM) of the saline-treated mice. * P < 0.05 one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test when compared to saline-treated mice. c Representative immunoblot showing the expression of A 2A R, D 2 R and DAT in striatal membranes from animals from the same groups shown in a ; striatal membranes from PCP-treated mice were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (50 μg of protein/lane) and immunoblotted using guinea pig anti-A 2A R, rabbit anti-D 2 R, goat anti-DAT and rabbit anti-α-actinin antibodies (see ‘Methods’). d Relative quantification of A 2A R, D 2 R and DAT expression; the immunoblot protein bands corresponding to A 2A R, D 2 R, DAT and α-actinin from the same animals shown in a were quantified by densitometric scanning; values were normalized by the respective amount α-actinin in each lane to correct for protein loading. Results are expressed as percentage (mean ± SEM) of the corresponding saline-treated animal; *** P < 0.001, two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc test.

    Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology

    Article Title: Decreased striatal adenosine A 2A -dopamine D 2 receptor heteromerization in schizophrenia

    doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00872-9

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a PPI impairment in saline- ( n = 10) and PCP-treated animals ( n = 10) with or without chronic treatment with haloperidol (Halo, 0.1 mg/kg/day for 5 days) or clozapine (Clz, 10 mg/kg/day for 5 days); results are expressed as percentage (mean ± SEM) of inhibition of ASR at the 75 dB amplitude prepulse acoustic stimulus; * P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test compared to saline-treated mice. b A 2A R–D 2 R heteromerization in striatal membranes from the same animals shown in a determined by AlphaLISA method (see ‘Methods’); the specific AlphaLISA signal (i.e., ∆AlphaLISA) was calculated as described in the ‘Methods’ section and expressed as percentage (mean ± SEM) of the saline-treated mice. * P < 0.05 one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test when compared to saline-treated mice. c Representative immunoblot showing the expression of A 2A R, D 2 R and DAT in striatal membranes from animals from the same groups shown in a ; striatal membranes from PCP-treated mice were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (50 μg of protein/lane) and immunoblotted using guinea pig anti-A 2A R, rabbit anti-D 2 R, goat anti-DAT and rabbit anti-α-actinin antibodies (see ‘Methods’). d Relative quantification of A 2A R, D 2 R and DAT expression; the immunoblot protein bands corresponding to A 2A R, D 2 R, DAT and α-actinin from the same animals shown in a were quantified by densitometric scanning; values were normalized by the respective amount α-actinin in each lane to correct for protein loading. Results are expressed as percentage (mean ± SEM) of the corresponding saline-treated animal; *** P < 0.001, two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc test.

    Article Snippet: Mouse striatal and human caudate membranes were homogenized in AlphaLISA buffer (AlphaLISA HiBlock Buffer, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, EEUU) and protein concentration determined.

    Techniques: Saline, Inhibition, Western Blot, Expressing, SDS Page, Quantitative Proteomics